From Specialization to Generalization: Instruction-tuned LLMs for Robust Harmful Content Mitigation

From Specialization to Generalization: Instruction-tuned LLMs for Robust Harmful Content Mitigation 待解读

下载

可分享卡片

适合发到公众号、飞书、社群群发，帮助团队复用高质量解读。

From Specialization to Generalization: Instruction-tuned LLMs for Robust Harmful Content Mitigation
作者: Lukas Edman, Daryna Dementieva, Alexander Fraser

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance across a wide range of general NLP tasks; however, their effectiveness in sensitive domains, such as hate speech detection, remains less clear. Prior studie…

详情页: https://www.ourxiv.cn/2608.25605v1

分享到 X

新用户看这篇论文该怎么开始

先点「赞助解读」，AI 会把论文转成可直接执行的行动清单。
看完“可执行改进行动”后，可快速决定是否值得立项。
用上面的卡片内容直接发给团队，减少重复阅读。

先订阅关键词，后续不再手工筛论文

摘要

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance across a wide range of general NLP tasks; however, their effectiveness in sensitive domains, such as hate speech detection, remains less clear. Prior studies comparing prompted LLMs with state-of-the-art encoder-based models (e.g., BERT variants (Roy et al., 2023; Dönmez et al., 2024)) have shown only marginal gains, suggesting that LLMs may not excel in hate speech detection or mitigation. In this work, we revisit this question through the lens of instruction tuning. By thoroughly unifying 36 English hate speech datasets spanning multiple labeling schemes, we fine-tune a generalist LLM, based on Qwen3 (Qwen Team, 2025), specifically for hate speech mitigation. Our results demonstrate not only state-of-the-art performance on in-domain benchmarks but also substantial improvements in cross-domain and cross-lingual generalization--areas where encoder-based specialist classifiers often struggle.

分析报告

暂无报告。点击“分析”开始生成。

个性化解读与社区共享解读不同

用自己的话告诉 AI 你想要什么样的解读（比如"用大白话讲给非专业人士听"、"重点分析对我们团队 RAG 系统的可迁移性"），生成一份只属于你自己的版本；生成后也可以选择设为"愿意共享"，被更多人看到、点赞。